Sunday, July 23, 2017

Dunkirk (2017)




There are times when man ask profound questions like, “What is the meaning of life?” or “What is my purpose?” or even “Balbir Pasha ko Aids hoga kya” bur rarely it happens that after watching a Christopher Nolen film you ask yourself, “Why the hell did he make this movie?”

To have expectation from a Nolen movie is understandable, even statutory; however while watching the movie we felt like young teenagers ready to jump from the 5th floor in the expectation of being rescued by a Superhero, alas Shaktimaan never came. We kept on hoping for some drama to unfold, which never happens.

We kept on waiting for something to happen, story to keep moving, to have some extra ordinary dialogues appear and make our mind numb. What we got was a documentary without a voice over.

Nolen is the master of non liner storytelling, nobody does it better than him and Quentin Tarantino; however to watch same events from 3 perspectives and 3 different camera angles without actually getting any new insight makes it worst.

I judge a movie on what I took away from it after it ended, was it entertaining, was it informational, did it gave me a new perspective, what kind of emotions did it provoke? In present case the answer will be disappointment.

Don’t get me wrong, people are praising the movie like anything for its artistic beauty, I literary had to open Wikipedia to understand what the director wanted to say, it turns out what he wanted to say was nothing interesting.

My friends who went with me to watch the movie kept on looking at me with vicious glances as if accusing me of not only dragging them on a Sunday, but also as if I personally gave advice on story and presentation of the movie's director.

 Rating *1/2.

No comments:

Post a Comment